GHAG

Veiled Plots, Firm Defences

By Aishma Gul 

“Borders are not lines on a map—they are testaments of trust, vigilance, and sacrifice.” 

Yet the Pakistan–Afghanistan frontier remains one of the world’s most porous and contested boundaries.

Between 25 and 27 April 2025, an Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) press release reported that Pakistan’s security forces neutralised 71 militants attempting to infiltrate through this border—recovering a significant cache of weapons, ammunition, and explosives in the process. Pakistan has blamed rival India for orchestrating the efforts through proxy groups but Afghanistan has repeatedly denied that its soil facilitates anti-Pakistan militants. The surge comes against a wider backdrop in which 2024 emerged as the deadliest year in a decade for Pakistan’s security forces, with 685 personnel killed amid 444 terror attacks across the country.

Rise in Infiltration Attempts

The ISPR said that on the nights of April 25/26 and 26/27, it observed a large group of militants—whom the military termed “khwarij” — trying to cross over into North Waziristan’s Hassan Khel area. The infiltrators were engaged by own troops effectively from opposite directions resulting in the elimination of 54 of them on the first night while another 17 were killed the next night, the highest single operation toll in the ongoing counterterrorism campaign. Large quantities of arms, ammunition and explosive devices were recovered from the deceased terrorists indicating the hand of multiple forces behind the attack.

Operational Excellence & Security Forces Response

The security forces’ ability to detect and engage a well-armed group in rugged terrain speaks to enhanced surveillance, intelligence integration, and rapid-reaction capabilities. Targeting was based on early warning from unmanned aerial systems and ground surveillance radars, and precision firepower blocked the militants from moving out to disperse. The ISPR underlined that the “precise and skillful engagement” had thwarted what may have turned out to be a major terrorist assault in Pakistan.

Intelligence Insights: Foreign Masters and Geopolitical Stakes

According to intelligence estimates cited by ISPR, this khwarij cell was acting “on behalf of their foreign masters” to conduct terrorist activities within Pakistan’s territory – a veiled reference to Indian support. Pakistan maintains that the Indian motives are strategic- to preoccupy Pakistan forces in the war on terror and give breathing space to terrorists. Military Commanders reinforced this narrative during a recent Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS), framing India’s actions as a deliberate ploy to undermine Pakistan’s counterterrorism efforts.

Afghan Government’s Stance and Cooperation Dynamics

Despite Pakistani pleas, Afghanistan’s interim administration has consistently denied hosting anti-Pakistan militant groups. In a statement, the Islamic Emirate reaffirmed that “Afghanistan will not pose a threat to any country,” rejecting allegations made by Pakistan’s leadership In a statement. Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesmen have emphasized however, that “counterterrorism cooperation is not unconditional” meaning that it is conditioned by Kabul preventing its land from being used to launch cross-border attacks. In a rare visit to Kabul, Afghanistan’s acting foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, said he was “concerned and sad” about the forced deportation of tens of thousands of Afghans by Pakistan, while Pakistani officials sought enhanced border management and intelligence-sharing mechanisms.

Historical and Statistical Context

– Recent Engagements: In addition to the 71 militants killed on 25–27 April, earlier operations in April saw security forces eliminate eight infiltrators in North Waziristan, recovering another arms cache .

– Broader Trends: The security situation throughout Pakistan even saw an overall decrease of 13% in violence between January 2025 and March 2025 as compared to the same period last year, while Khyber Pakthunkhwa and Balochiston continued to be inflicted with 98% of fatal incidents.

– Deadliest Year: As many as 1,612 people – including 685 security personnel – were killed in 444 terror attacks in 2024, reflecting a 73 per cent rise in fatalities over the preceding year.

– Operational Success: Across various sectors, Pakistani forces neutralised over 925 insurgents in 2024, though attacks rose by 40 percent year-on-year, according to sources.

Strategic Implications and Regional Dynamics

The porous 2,500km Durand Line traverses critical trade corridors and tribal areas, creating a mesh of security and commerce. India’s recent maritime and diplomatic pressure—such as suspending the Indus Waters Treaty—reflects the broader India-Pakistan contestation, with both sides accusing the other of harbouring proxies . Meanwhile, the United States has urged a “responsible resolution” to cross-border tensions, cautioning against actions that could escalate into wider conflict.

Pakistan’s successful neutralisation of the latest infiltration attempt underscores its growing counterterrorism capabilities, but true security will depend on sustained diplomatic pressure, revitalised border cooperation with Afghanistan, community-based vigilance, and addressing broader regional tensions. Turning this potentially explosive frontier into a zone of stability requires more than strength at the border; it needs strategic trust-building that demonstrates that the strongest fences are built not just with concrete and wire, but with cooperation, foresight and a shared commitment to peace.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Related Posts